Mùa Xuân thức giấc. 03/04/2018anle20 Em có tin Mùa Xuân thức giấc Nơi em vừa đi qua ?… Nhà thơ Bùi Thanh Huyền Share this:Bấm để chia sẻ trên Twitter (Opens in new window)Nhấn vào chia sẻ trên Facebook (Opens in new window)Thích bài này:Thích Đang tải...
In my opinion that I do respect former President Obama, but I’m not believing him. Because his tow terms, the Obama had invaded to Libya and killed Qaddafi when the US Constitution did not allow any the American president did this.Second, the Obama was supporting for Syria when the foreign Assistance Act did not have it.Third, when traveling to Vietnamese communist regime, the Obama had declared and said, ” Today does not have a super nation, it invades to a small nation.” Ironically, the Obama has forgotten when his U.A. Army had been come to Vietnam for thirty years in the past, killed his partnership was Republic of Vietnam. In compare, we think about 911 terrorism, it attacked to our national America only one day and one time when our nation was destroying in Republic of Vietnam for the thirty years and selling the South Vietnam to communism, but our national America did not compensate any pennies for injuries and prisoners of war and wounded soldiers. Therefore, I have been proving for the Vietnam War case, which is: 31/ Pages.14
1 U.S.C. § 113. July 30,1947
In his opinion that the justice of a super nation is expressed by the Constitution, but it did not perform perfectly, it is arrogant. Because the all of edition of laws and treaties; slip laws; Treaties and other international Acts series or the so-called is “Little and Brown” of the other foreign nations and the Defendant- the US were admissibility in evidences which is why between Republic of Vietnam and defendant-the US of edition of laws and treaties; slip laws; Treaties and other international Acts series; the Paris Peace Accords did not only perform at least but also were torn in all- and for example, the Paris peace Accords of International Treaty was torn by the defendant-the US. Why did the US Congress enact the laws when the defendant-the US did not respect them? Because of the Congress of a super nation did not look like a pirate group in which was undisciplined soldier. That is why, the US Congress has been enacting the laws in which were to be Constitutional Rights, the defendant-the US was all torn the laws of between Republic of Vietnam and the defendant-the US. What did whom respect the US Constitution? the See this law:
1 U.S. Code § 113 – “Little and Brown’s” edition of laws and treaties; slip laws; Treaties and Other International Acts Series; admissibility in evidence
· US Code
· Authorities (CFR)
prev | next
The edition of the laws and treaties of the United States, published by Little and Brown, and the publications in slip or pamphlet form of the laws of the United States issued under the authority of the Archivist of the United States, and the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent evidence of the several public and private Acts of Congress, and of the treaties, international agreements other than treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the United States, and of the several States, without any further proof or authentication thereof. (July 30, 1947, ch. 388, 61 Stat. 636; Pub. L. 89–497, § 1, July 8, 1966, 80 Stat. 271; Pub. L. 98–497, title I, § 107(d), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2291.